Abstract:   The conceptualization of globalization begs redefinition under the current ideological context after the post/meta discussions that took place on the last three decades. The post/meta paradigm demands a meta globalization perspective; the globalization of globalization (like climate change in the himalayas) and the post modernism, colonialism, perspective begs to review the globalization from non global-hegemonic cultures and lifeviews (like local responses to cultural appropriations and glocalization of hegemonically imposed memes).

 

Outline:

How is globalization defined by the hegemonic cultural paradigm?

What does the meta perspective demand from a concept of globalization?

What does the conceptualization of globalization mean in a postmodern perspective?

How is the performative logic of globalization understood under non hegemonic worldviews?

We can think of globalization as something that happens to something. Like to a meme or to a kind of government, it is an action an us subjectivity performs over a subject that goes global.

What are the local responses to the globalizing initiatives thrust upon them? 

Anuncios